Published January 14, 2011


Tourney turmoil

School officials' feelings about changes run the gamut

By SCOTT SANDSBERRY
YAKIMA HERALD-REPUBLIC

In a way, this year's profound changes in the high school state basketball tournaments -- essentially, from four-day, 16-team tournaments to three-day, eight-team events preceded the previous weekend by regional-site games -- has been coming for a long time.

"It's been discussed probably at least the last 15 years," said Mike Colbrese, executive director of the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association. "There were actually two different communities -- maybe three -- that have discussed the issue of revamping state basketball tournaments, but could never get any traction over which way to go."

Why, then, are so many athletic directors and coaches around the state responding as if they've been run over by a truck that came out of nowhere?

Some of the responses by a Herald-Republic statewide survey of athletic directors, coaches, principals and superintendents indicate a certain unrest in the ranks.

From an athletic director in the Class 3A Metro League: "I'm sorry, but if our kids are playing in a regional-site game at Mountlake Terrace or some other high school and that's as far as they go, you can't tell me that's a state-tournament experience."

From an AD in Southwest Washington's Class 2B Central League: "We felt like in our league, our district, that it was just rammed through and we didn't have a voice."

From an AD in the 3A Seamount League: "My name's not going to be mentioned, right? Well, I would have preferred to stay at 16."

From a coach in the Class 1A Caribou Trail League: "We all got blindsided. It's the most ridiculous thing the state has done in, maybe, ever."

* * * * *

That something needed to be done, particularly at the 3A and 4A level, was a generally accepted premise.

The 4A tournament has seen its attendance dwindle from 33,098 in 2006 to 27,269 last winter, while 3A numbers have dropped from 28,871 in '06 to 23,140 last year -- when they actually went up nearly 4,000 over 2009's abysmal turnout. Consolation-bracket games at the big-school state tourneys at the Tacoma Dome have routinely been played before near-empty grandstands.

The WIAA's ill-advised two-year experiment of moving the 3A tourney to Seattle for 2007 and 2008 was another factor. Instead of renewing interest in the event, it resulted in a financial bloodletting for the WIAA. The change in venues ran up an additional $120,000 in expenses while actually bringing in fewer spectators than the event had drawn in Tacoma.

For those very reasons, a lot of school administrators are very supportive of the new format. Among 80 athletic directors surveyed by the Herald-Republic, a majority of large-school (4A and 3A) support the change, and a handful of smaller-school ADs do as well.

"We're fine with the change," said Jim Clem, athletic director at Class 2A Burlington-Edison. "We think with the state that we're in, as far as education goes and the budget cuts every district is facing, we're all looking for ways to save money.

"As much as we would like to see the 16-team tournament stay in place, we also realize that in order to have sports, we need to make some changes so we can afford to have them."

Brenda Terpstra, another 2A AD at Mount Baker, agreed.

"In a perfect world and from a competitive standpoint, I'd like to stay with the 16," she said.

"But it's a money issue, and it will save schools money."

* * * * *

Whether the measure becomes money-saving for schools, though, may depend a lot on where those schools are. Many smaller-school representatives were in favor of the regional-site format only to change their mind when they got a look at the regional brackets, which the WIAA released this week.

"We could send our girls to Walla Walla and our boys to Mountlake Terrace (for regional-site games)," said athletic director Charlie Groth of Class 1B Curlew, which is in northeast Washington, a five-hour drive from one site
and six hours from the other.

"That means double the transportation costs and, depending on the game times, probably extra lodging costs. If we have good teams that are fortunate enough to make it all the way to the final day, it will end up costing us a lot more."

In 2B, a team from District 6 in North Central Washington could end up playing its regional-site games 5 1/2 hours away in Longview, and 1A boys and girls teams from Tonasket near the Canadian border could end split between Wenatchee and Spokane.

Gary Smith, the girls coach at Okanogan, said making long road trips on consecutive weekends makes it "much more dangerous" for some fans.

"I know with the way (the tournament format) has been, Yakima is a long trip, but it's one trip. They go down there, stay there until it's over and come home," Smith said. "The first time some players' grandparents gets killed on the highway coming back from one of these regional trips will be one too many."

Brewster principal Linda Dezellem said fans should never have to choose between following their school's boys or girls team.

"Sport is all about the family, and when you make them have to choose, that's not right," Dezellem said. "I always thought WIAA was behind the family. I'm kind of upset."

Clearly, Dezellem was not alone.

The Herald-Republic's straw poll asked a simple question of 121 individuals at 101 schools of all sizes in all corners of the state: From your perspective at your school, do you 1) support of the change to the new regional-site, then eight-team final tournament format; 2) prefer staying at the previous four-day, 16-team format; or 3) wish to see a split, with the large schools going to the new, eight-team format and leave the 2A-and-smaller schools in their traditional 16-team format.

The overall results found only 31, including 28 athletic directors, in favor of the new format; 56, half of them ADs, wanted to stay in the old format; 16 wanted to see the big/small-school split; and eight opted to take a wait-and-see approach.

Surprisingly, of 17 principals and superintendents polled -- only one of them from District 5, serving this part of the state -- only two liked the new format.

And coaches, well, they pretty much hated it.

"Somebody just flat turned their brain off," said Smith, the Okanogan coach, "when they dreamed this thing up."

East Valley (Yakima) girls coach Robi Raab scoffed at the "Hardwood Classic name the WIAA has given its new format.

"It's a classic, all right," Raab said. "It's a classic mistake."

 


Share |

ADVERTISEMENT

Copyright 2002-2012 All photos, content and design
are properties of the Yakima Herald-Republic.
 

For questions or additional information
about this site, send us feedback.

Privacy statement

:: HOME

Related stories
:: Costly turnover
:: Tourney turmoil
:: Return to team reimbursements?
:: What's a mother to do?
:: Is it really a 'state' game?
:: So much for 'Hoosiers'
:: Little schools have held their own
:: Big schools haven't done their part
:: So, were there any other options?